Analysis of Greenhouse Humidification Technology and Equipment Application
The Importance of Greenhouse Humidification
In modern agricultural production systems, greenhouses serve as a crucial form of facility agriculture, providing controlled environmental conditions for crop growth. Among these, humidity control is a key aspect of greenhouse environment management. Appropriate humidity levels not only directly affect physiological processes such as photosynthesis, transpiration, and nutrient absorption in crops but also effectively prevent the occurrence of pests and diseases. Research shows that most greenhouse crops grow best within a relative humidity range of 60%-80%, with excessively high or low humidity leading to growth inhibition and reduced quality.
The necessity of greenhouse humidification is mainly reflected in the following aspects: First, during high-temperature seasons or in arid regions, the interior of greenhouses can easily become too dry due to ventilation and transpiration. Second, certain special crops, such as tropical plants and seedlings, have higher humidity requirements. Furthermore, modern greenhouse environmental control systems often require precise humidity regulation to achieve optimal growing conditions. Therefore, scientific and reasonable humidification methods have become an essential technical consideration in greenhouse engineering.

Comparison of Common Greenhouse Humidification Methods
Traditional Humidification Methods
Spray humidification is one of the most traditional greenhouse humidification methods, using high-pressure pumps to atomize water into fine particles dispersed into the air. This method is simple, direct, and low-cost but suffers from uneven humidification and the risk of excessive leaf wetness, which can lead to disease. Another traditional method is the wet curtain-fan system, which utilizes the principle of water evaporation to cool and increase humidity simultaneously. Data shows that a standard wet curtain-fan system in greenhouse engineering can increase relative humidity by 20%-30%, but its effectiveness is highly dependent on external climatic conditions.
Floor watering is another simple humidification method that increases air humidity by enhancing water evaporation from the greenhouse floor. This approach requires no complex equipment but offers low control precision and can lead to localized over-wetting or water waste. Notably, while these traditional methods are cost-effective, their application in modern precision agriculture is becoming increasingly limited.

Modern Humidification Technologies
Ultrasonic humidifiers represent the advancement of modern humidification technology. They work by using high-frequency vibrations to break water molecules into ultra-fine particles of 1-5 micrometers. This type of humidification equipment features low energy consumption (typically 30W-60W), high humidification efficiency (up to 90% or more), and precise control. In greenhouse engineering practice, ultrasonic humidifiers are particularly suitable for areas with strict humidity requirements, such as seedling zones or special crop cultivation areas.
High-pressure micro-fog systems are another efficient modern humidification solution, emitting water as extremely fine mist particles (5-15 micrometers) through specialized nozzles. The system typically operates at pressures around 7 MPa, ensuring excellent atomization and prolonged suspension of water mist in the air. Tests show that a well-designed micro-fog system can increase humidity from 40% to 75% within 10 minutes in a 1,000-cubic-meter greenhouse space. Such systems are often integrated with greenhouse automation control systems for precise regulation.
Selection and Application of Greenhouse Humidification Equipment
Key Factors in Equipment Selection
Choosing suitable humidification equipment for greenhouse engineering requires consideration of multiple factors. The first is greenhouse scale: large multi-span greenhouses usually require distributed placement of multiple humidifiers or a centralized humidification system. The second is crop requirements: different crops have varying humidity needs at different growth stages. For example, tomato seedlings require around 80% relative humidity, while the fruiting stage is best maintained at 60%-70%.
Energy efficiency is another critical consideration. Comparatively, ultrasonic humidifiers have the highest energy efficiency ratio, producing approximately 1.2-1.5 kg of water mist per kWh of electricity. High-pressure micro-fog systems rank next at 0.8-1.0 kg/kWh, while traditional spray methods are the least efficient at only 0.3-0.5 kg/kWh. Additionally, water quality requirements, maintenance costs, and system compatibility must also be factored into the decision-making process.
Installation and Layout Guidelines
The placement of humidification equipment directly affects its performance. Generally, equipment should be installed in well-ventilated areas, avoiding direct spraying on crops. For high-pressure micro-fog systems, nozzles are typically mounted at a height of 2.5-3 meters above the ground, spaced 3-4 meters apart in a staggered arrangement. This layout ensures even mist diffusion, achieving coverage rates of over 95%.
In greenhouse engineering practice, humidification equipment often works in coordination with other components of the environmental control system. For example, micro-fog systems can be interlocked with fans to promote air circulation during operation or paired with heating systems to prevent excessive temperature drops during winter humidification. Data shows that such integrated designs can reduce greenhouse environmental parameter fluctuations by more than 40%.

Management and Maintenance of Humidification Systems
Daily Operation Management
Scientific operation strategies can significantly enhance humidification system efficiency. Phased regulation based on crop needs is key—for instance, increasing humidity during daytime photosynthesis peaks and reducing it at night to prevent disease. In modern greenhouse engineering, such adjustments are often automated via PLC controllers, which modulate humidification levels in real-time based on sensor feedback.
Water quality management is equally critical, especially for precision humidification equipment. Untreated water sources can lead to nozzle clogging, equipment corrosion, and other issues. It is recommended to use filtered (at least 20 μm precision) and softened water, with ultrasonic humidifiers requiring deionized water to prolong transducer lifespan. Statistics indicate that proper water quality management can extend maintenance intervals for humidification equipment by 2-3 times.
Maintenance and Troubleshooting
Regular maintenance is fundamental to ensuring long-term stable operation of humidification equipment. For high-pressure micro-fog systems, nozzles should be checked weekly for blockages, filters cleaned monthly, and high-pressure pumps inspected quarterly. Ultrasonic humidifiers require periodic replacement of transducers (typically lasting 3,000-5,000 hours) and regular tank cleaning. Records show that standardized maintenance procedures can reduce equipment failure rates by over 60%.
Common troubleshooting measures include: checking water supply and filters when mist output decreases; inspecting pumps or fans for abnormal noises; and examining sensors and electrical connections for control system malfunctions. Greenhouse engineering managers should maintain comprehensive equipment records, documenting operational parameters and maintenance history to aid in fault diagnosis.
Trends in Greenhouse Humidification Technology
Advances in Intelligent Control
The integration of IoT technology is transforming greenhouse humidification equipment methods. New-generation intelligent humidification equipment equipped with wireless sensor networks can monitor microenvironmental changes across greenhouse zones in real-time. Using machine learning algorithms, these systems predict humidity trends and adjust settings proactively, achieving control precision within ±3%. Data indicates that such predictive control strategies can save 15%-20% in energy while minimizing crop stress from humidity fluctuations.
The application of digital twin technology in greenhouse engineering also offers new approaches to humidification optimization. By creating virtual greenhouse models, engineers can simulate the effects of different humidification strategies to identify optimal solutions. For example, a demonstration base using digital twin technology reduced humidification system energy consumption by 22% while improving humidity stability by 35%.
Conclusion
As a critical component of environmental control, greenhouse humidification equipment directly impacts crop yield and quality. From traditional spray methods to intelligent micro-fog systems, humidification technology has evolved significantly. In modern greenhouse engineering, selecting appropriate humidification equipment (accounting for approximately 5%-8% of system investment) and managing it scientifically can create ideal growing conditions. Looking ahead, with the deepening of precision agriculture and sustainable development concepts, greenhouse humidification equipment technology will become more intelligent, efficient, and eco-friendly, providing stronger support for facility agriculture. Growers should choose technically mature, easy-to-maintain humidification solutions tailored to their conditions while emphasizing overall system coordination to fully realize the production potential of modern greenhouses.










